Crafting a clear response
It seems we haven't been asked to fetch data; the user just posted something. I think it makes sense to ask for clarification about what they want to know. Since this is straightforward, I could offer concise context about the net rating per 100 possessions and include a caution about the small sample size. I should mention that this rating implies dominance, highlighting synergy between players. Finally, I could suggest a comparable lineup for additional context.
这是个很夸张的净效率值。简单解读和注意点：
- 含义：两人同场时每100回合净胜23.8分，属于“碾压级”表现；参考系是联盟顶级球队赛季净效率通常在+8到+12左右。
- 可能原因：SGA的持球杀伤与中距离稳定性拉高进攻下限；切特的空间+护筐让进攻拉开、防守收紧；两人协同让雷霆能同时打5-out与高强度换防/弱侧协防。
- 轮换影响：双人组净效率会受同时在场的三位队友构成影响，未必完全等于这两人的“纯”影响力。
- 样本量：若分钟数不大，数值会随赛程与对手强度回归；建议看分钟阈值（如>300或>500分钟）更有参考性。
- 对比基准：可与两人各自的“单独在场”与“同时不在”对比，判断真实抬升幅度。 
需要我帮你查原文出处和准确样本分钟/赛季区间，或做下列分解吗？
- 主客场、对强队/弱队分档
- 关键时刻（clutch）表现
- 与其他双人组（如SGA+J-Dub、切特+J-Dub）对比