Considering deal structure options
I think we could offer different approaches: verify accuracy, translate details, provide background, discuss tactics, fee analysis, or compare alternatives. Including typical processes and contexts is important. For the deal structure, we might consider options like permanent transfers, loans, or wage splits. I also want to mention performance data, like 14 Bundesliga appearances with 2 goals and 2 assists. However, I’ll keep the details general if I’m unsure. Lastly, we can check sources and possibly do a web search as needed.Crafting a concise response
I can ask whether they want to check real-time updates. I’ll respond in Chinese, keeping it concise by asking what specific help they need. A €20 million fee represents a significant loss compared to the purchase price, influenced by wages, relationships, and a limited market. Dortmund might prefer a loan with an option due to cash constraints, while United could push for a permanent deal with a sell-on clause. I should also mention risks, the deadline timeline, and ask if they want me to check sources.
看到了这条传闻：多特和曼联谈桑乔，标价约2000万欧。你希望我做什么：核实最新消息、做转会可行性分析，还是聊战术/薪资结构影响？
快速解读
- 价格面：2000万欧明显低于曼联当初投入，符合“高薪+合同年限缩短+队内关系紧张”导致的折价逻辑；若成行，常见做法是固定+浮动、再加二转分成条款把总包抬到2500–3000万欧区间。
- 薪资问题：桑乔的周薪偏高，多特若买断通常需要曼联补贴或球员降薪；否则更可能是租借（带买断/义务）。
- 多特立场：现金流谨慎，偏向带选项的租借；若买断，可能要求分期+与出场/成绩挂钩的附加。
- 曼联立场：倾向永久转出释放工资空间；若仅租借，通常会推动较高租借费+买断条款。 
- 关键变量：合同剩余年限与球员意愿、曼联主帅/管理层对其回归空间评估、是否有其他竞价方插入（会抬价）。
需要我：
- 实时查权威来源（俱乐部/罗马诺/TMW/TA/天空体育）并给出可信度评级
- 做一份交易结构方案（固定+浮动+分成）的测算
- 对多特战术适配与轮换位置做简评
- 对比多特的其他边锋目标/预算取舍
告诉我你更关心哪块，我就深入。